Showing posts with label "treaty process". Show all posts
Showing posts with label "treaty process". Show all posts

7/31/08

Maori tribe in autonomy talks with NZ government

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — A rebellious New Zealand Maori tribe entered into negotiations with the government Thursday in a bid to gain autonomy over its land.

Ngai Tuhoe is the only Maori tribe that refused to sign the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi, which established peaceful relations between New Zealand's indigenous groups and white settlers.

Tuhoe still insists it retains sovereign control over its culture and its lands in central North Island, which it claims were confiscated illegally by settlers in the 1800s.

continues here

Video Here: http://www.3news.co.nz//tabid/808/Default.aspx

Related News

Full coverage »

6/25/08

How much do Maori love justice?


Thanks to Papa Tuanuku for this commentry

If you divide the forest money among the members of the iwi involved, it comes to $4000 each for the loss of their lands in the 1800s and 1900s. Compare that to Alan Titford who got well over $1m for compensation for a farm in the 1990s.

Ironically, the plane money some iwi are spending to get to the signing will eat into each person's entitlement. Imagine getting $4000 compo and spending a grand of it flying to a hotel to perform at the compo ceremony in Wgtn!

Where is all the justice money going?

The Maori news this week is all about crime in South Auckland and forest claims. Ironically, the roots of the South Auckland 'crime wave' are in the land grabs of the last 200 years.

But will the mokopuna of the lands grab lands get social and economic equality now that their $4000 compo is being given to a new corporate iwi structure? Are they even represented in the tribal mandating processes?

Meanwhile, the mokopuna of the 1800s land grabbers are spending $2 building new prisons for every $1 they spend on 'land' justice. Well, we have 4 brand new prisons and a zillion dollars maintaining and staffing them, and paying for the cops to gather up the mokopuna of the lands in question.

So who is (still) getting rich off Maori misery?

Speed

Two arms of justice have sped up in the last 10 years. Prisons have been fast tracked, who would have thought ten years ago that Ngawha, Manurewa and Meremere would have their own prisons?

The other 'sped up' justice is in the lands. It coincides with the rise of the Maori Party. Suddenly, Micheal Cullen wants to settle 30 year old land claims. Hence the forest stuff going on. Don't believe the hype about this whole thing being sped up, like he's doing a favour returning a portion of the stolen goods.

We've waited a long time for these crumbs, and they government has spent $30 million on negotiations thus far. In my book, spending $30 million on discussions when our people are hungry is immoral. What do you think?

If the government successfully uses this forest deal as a means to undermine the Maori Party, and by extension an independent Maori voice, then we have been complicit in the demise of our ability to advocate staunchly for the mokopuna who do not yet have a voice.

Where does Tane fit into this?

We are the mokopuna of Tane Mahuta. Who the hell came up with the name Treelords, turning the relationship with the tree god back to front? It's this sort of thinking that has got the world on an environmental edge, thinking that we have domain over the lands. The name is offensive, so we need to challenge those that use it.

What shall we do?

We need to stand on issues this:

- discuss and think honestly about what is on offer here? What is the motivation for the 'leadership' to be coming on masse to Wgtn? Whose agendas is this? How cheap ARE the Maori seats?

- Help in the contribution to honest, forthright, staunch nation building korero.

- Tautoko the Maori that challenge this whole thing. If there are Maori opposed to this, at least someone is being staunch to the legacy of the tupuna.Think about the opportunity costs - if it means that our 'leaders' should spend their time undermining other Maori like Shane Jones and Api Mahuika have been doing, what is the psychological cost of these deals?

-

Well, kua takoto te manuka.



7/18/07

Lone Voice Defies TFN Treaty Manipulation



Meet Bertha Williams of the Tsawwassen First Nation, who in a recent letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper pulled back the curtain on the TFN treaty process - revealing a pattern of taxpayer-funded government manipulation for treaty ratification. The treaty and related agreements pave the way to a massive government-driven expansion of nearby Deltaport, which the threatens the local environment, agricultural land, and TFN band members' very way of life.

6/30/07

It's the land we want - Haapu

By RICHARD WOODD - Taranaki Daily News | Friday, 29 June 2007

A hapu claiming an ancestral right to the old Hawera Hospital site
says it's not interested in the buildings, only the land, which was
its Nga Tupaea tribal marae in pre-European times.

"We don't want the buildings because they are full of asbestos and
will be difficult and expensive to remove for demolition," hapu
spokesman Chris Turahui said.

Commenting on Ngati Ruanui chairman Sid Kahuranui's statement that the
hospital land was part of the $41 million treaty claim settlement
package in 2001, Mr Turahui said: "Tupaea were shut out of that
settlement and we've received nothing from it, even though all the
local marae have been given $100,000 each. We did not give Ngati
Ruanui the right to settle on our behalf. We were out-manoeuvred and
not properly advised. There's been friction between us and Ruanui ever
since."

He said the hapu's objective was to interfere with the tendering
process to sell the hospital property, by the Taranaki District Health
Board. Tenders close on August 1. He had been unable to make contact
with the board.

"I hope we are achieving that," he said. "Whoever puts in a tender
must realise that they are really only buying the buildings, because
it's our land and we want the title to it."

He said Tupaea was a barely functional organisation "because we have
no money. We have been given the Turuturumokai marae by Ngati Ruanui
and we are waiting for the transfer of title. But we have no funds for
development and improvements there."

5/2/07

Coast Tsimshian to take direct Action

By Shaun Thomas
The Northern View
May 02 2007

The Metlakatla and Lax Kw’alaams First Nations, collectively the Coast Tsimshian, said last week that they are calling on the Federal Government to halt phase II of the container port development and are preparing to undertake more direct actions meant to “not allow phase I to commence operations unless our concerns have been addressed.”

“There has been a build up of frustration that has been building up for close to a year now. When the port put us on notice that they were starting on phase II, we decided enough was enough. The government, which has the legal obligation to consult and deal with First Nations, has ignored us and has not come to the table. Our membership was getting frustrated with the leaders and ourselves so we have to take our own action. We have to do something on our own to get them back to the table and resolve phase I of this before we move on to phase II,” said Metlakatla Chief Harold Leighton.

“Phase I is currently being built on one of our large village sites, and phase II goes into two more village sites. They just want to go through with that without an agreement with the Coast Tsimshian. We can’t allow that.”

According to Leighton, the group will begin to make people aware of their plans this week, although he notes that the planned increase in activity is being done as a means of last resort for the Coast Tsimshian.

“This is not out doing. First Nations have been patient for two years, we have been waiting to try and find ways to resolve this issue, but nobody seems to want to come to the table with us,” he said.

We didn’t want to go to court, we don’t want to get involved in direct action, but we cannot allow construction or businesses to develop in our territory without talking to us. We are not going to stand for that any more.”

Currently the Coast Tsimshian and the Federal Government are in court to determine whether or not there was adequate consultation on phase I of the project. Following the rejection of a $7.65 million offer of accommodation on February 28, 2006, which was made to all First Nations, the Federal Government sent a letter to the Coast Tsimshian advising them that the phase I consultation process was complete. Prince Rupert Port Authority President and CEO Don Krusel says he is confident the courts will find that consultation was adequate.

“We are disappointed that the Coast Tsimshian have chosen to take Court action or threaten direct protest rather than respond to the Offer of Accommodation presented upon the completion of the consultation process,” said Krusel.

According to Rod Nelson with Transport Canada, the government has invited the First Nations to discuss the issue and holds high hopes for the phase I operations.

“The container port benefits everyone living in Prince Rupert, including First Nations, and it benefits the whole B.C. economy…We’re hoping the port at Fairview Terminal opens a second gateway to meet the needs of the Asia-Pacific.”

In the mean time, Krusel said the port is making every attempt to consult with First Nations on phase II of the project, including how to mitigate adverse impacts and ensure the communities benefit from the project.

http://www.thenorthernview.com/portals-code/list.cgi?paper=142&cat=23&id=974445&more=